-->

Judge Roy Moore Like Candidate Trump Fell Victim To Women

Karate Champ (1990) | FULL MARTIAL ARTS MOVIE | Richard Norton - Rochell...

THE DRL BLOG



Links You May Like

Why Tun Dr Mahathir Was So Powerful When He was Prime Minister?>More Here

How To Stop Drinking Without Stopping!>Read More Here

Opportunist Writers From Indian Community> Read More

Judge Roy Moore Like Candidate Trump Fell Victim To Women>More here

Israel Can Stop Palestinians' Roket Firings From Gaza (Once And For All) >More

Contaminated Blood Coursing Through Muslim Veins A No-No>More

Clinton Or Trump>More

How You Intend To Vote in November?>More

Obama Took The Crown>More Here

Hannah Yeoh Won't Apologize For Wearing Headscarf>More..

Abdullah Rebuffed Them>More

Lim's Horrendous Success>More Here

Lim Guan Eng A Phenomenon>More

Even The Once Mighty British Seem To Have Thrown In The Towel>Read More

Clash Of Titans> More Here

Not Easy Being DAP>Read More

Pak Lah Was Too Kind To Do What Was Expected Of Him>More Here

President Trump: James Comey, You Are Fired>More

Not Easy Being MCA Leaders>More

A Commander-in-chief Who Doesn't Act Like One>More..

Nobel Prize Winners>More..

Trump Had Better Keep His Promise>More

Warning For The Rich And Powerful>Read More

Ananda Khrishnan Earned Bumiputra Status For For Indians In Malaysia>More?

MCA Must Demand Return Of All Its Traditional Seats>Read More

A British Adventurer Who Became King By His Own Hand>Read More

Where's The MAS Flight MH370 Now>More..

The Greatest Medicine Man Ever Lived>Read More

Can President Trump Single-handedly Take On His Enemies And Win>More here

Israel Can Stop Rocket Firings From Gaza (Once And For All) >Read More...

By David Lang

The following stories may fire your imagination, pique your interest. Some say 1MDB is Malaysia's Sovereign Wealth fund; to others they asked what wealth fund when its total capitalization is just One million ringgit? But, then again, if you think you can look down on the pet idea of the Malaysian prime minister, think again. His idea has the potential of turning the now world famous - or shall we say, infamous - 1Malaysia Development Berhad into a giant corporation you can ever imagine - even bigger than Bill Gate's Microsoft! At least, it could be, if the original course is stayed. It was supposed to inspire Malaysians to think big besides advance growth, according to its slogans screaming out of giant bill boards throughout the country. 'Backed' by the finance ministry who owns it - which means money will never be the problem - it can only succeed. But..it didn't. It failed! That's why it may have piqued many people's curiosity. How can a company flush with cash and can borrow any amount (billions) anytime could fail? Well, this may be in line with your thinking. People have seen since its inception - I mean after its name was changed in 1999 from Trengganu Investment Authority (TIA) to the present - it hasn't done any business! I have used present tense deliberately. It hasn't done any business yet. I mean if you are in business you need to make profit or find ways to make profit. Or close shop. Oh, I had heard about their filings of tax returns and hiring of a couple of internationally known auditors to sign off on their balance sheets; but these concerned only the company's borrowings and interests to be paid. Two massive bonds were issued to the tune of $7 billions. To buy up power plants. Again I want to say if you are in business to make money even investing in independent Power Plants, it should be done with the view to making a profit. The decision may be long term or short term, it doesn't matter, it has to make money, or no deal. May be they have done the right thing. Maybe luck was not on their side. Still, the amount is staggering. I didn't know having or managing so much money can be a problem! But many - especially the Malays - have not given up hope yet. Yes, may be the durians are just ripening; may be they need time and may fall soon!




Flying bat in a marquee

This is a automatic time























Recent Articles

This video is presented courtesy of Sally Page:







Malaysia's Vision 2020

By:David Lang

Malaysia is supposed to be on its way to becoming a developed nation, by the year 2020. Will she make it (in less than five years -tick-tuck, tick-tuck)? There is no doubt the year 2020 is coming whether the country is ready or not, and if that will be the only requirement then Malaysia will attain that developed nation status on schedule. There is a question, though, Will Malaysia, or Malaysians, for that matter, be ready for that status as far as their affluence, quality of life's concern? Currently Malaysia's GNI per capita stood at US$10060. According to the World Bank high income economies are those with GNI per capita of US$12,745. And until Malaysians earn much more to be there, the developed nation status may not be achieved even by the year 2020. The futility of declaring a country a high income country when it's not, achieves nothing. May be even counter-productive; it lulls the country into false sense of success and premature celebration. Don't forget China reportedly overtook Japan as the world's second largest economy, but in actual fact China's citizens' ca pita income is a fraction of the incomes of the Japanese who earn $37,000. Chinese incomes range from $13,000. China's gross domestic product, taken as a whole, may beat Japan's, but in term of quality of life, and GNI per capita income, the criteria for a developed nation status, China still has a lot of catching up to do. That's why China still qualifies as recipient of Japan's economic aid meant for developing countries. Comparing with the Chinese per capita domestic product, Malaysia is even worse off. Unless the government bucks up and rushes to create more wealth for its citizens, the Vision 2020 dream may remain just that ..a dream.

Jun 29, 2013

'MCA go home' vs 'Where was DAP 13 years ago?' at Jonker Walk

'MCA go home' vs 'Where was DAP 13 years ago?' at Jonker Walk
What?! Gan qualified his being there as a survey, not to protest? Let alone to lead the protest? Did Mr. Gan Tian Loo realize that the MCA protest carries more weight than DAP protest many times over. The state government, being UMNO-led government, considers the DAP as the opposition working hand-in-hand with PAS and PKR to oust UMNO from power, rescinding the directive on the request from DAP leaders will make the party even more popular. I thought, at first, here come the MCA, finally to do what it's supposed to do. Then the expected  happened. He got cold feet. The reporter who covered the protest reported Gan was suddenly cautious . He was like ..."I'm here to lend my support to..the .. no, wait! I am not here to support the traders - but just to do a quick survey! But I am glad to be standing here with the protesters but reporters, please put it down in black and white I am not, I repeat, am not here as part of the protest. This is the reason the MCA was shunned, I mean has been shunned by the Chinese. They do not represent the Chinese anymore. They cannot get things done anymore unlike in the old days. Gan admitted his meeting with the chief minister was fruitless, but would keep trying. Keep trying for what? He should stop embarrassing the MCA and reducing its credibility further by continuing to beg despite being rebuffed earlier. Again, this proved that the Malaysian Chinese Association has really completely lost its usefulness. If a small matter like Jonker Walk closure was beyond its power then, that 's it.

Jun 22, 2013

Anwar: 505 rally will go on - Nation | The Star Online

Anwar: 505 rally will go on - Nation | The Star Online

Black 505: Live updates - Nation | The Star Online

Black 505: Live updates - Nation | The Star Online

Feb 15, 2013

How To Repair Your Own Refrigerator And Save A Bundle





when I received a call the other day (night) from a Miss Lee complaining about her fridge not working (she noticed the temperature inside the fridge was warm comparable to room temperature), I asked her to check if the fridge's power switch was at on or off?

Nov 25, 2016

Jill Stein And Green Party Are Pawns To Sabotage Trump's Win







The Drl Blog





























If Hillary Won Would She Ask For Recount In Key States? Checked.

By David Lang

What Jill Stein has done defies all reasons and ethics. Checked.

In asking for a recount in three key states where Donald Trump won with razor-thin majorities, she or the Green Party toyed with the US constitution. Just because there is a provision all candidates have the right to file for recount in an election where no suspicious of vote fraud is detected., it doesn't mean they should. Checked.

They have to understand the main contender against Trump had already conceded defeat, which means they were satisfied with the way the election was conducted or won. Checked.

So, why are they perusing the matter when it's unnecessary and akin to intending to sabotaging the rights of the winner by creating gridlocks and bad narratives against Trump.Checked.

When pointed to him there was no evidence of fraud whatsoever, Green Party Martin insisted to go ahead with the recount "because we want to make sure all our votes count." Checked.

So when told the request for recount was an exercise in futility, he was defiant.Checked.

This action did not stem from desire to correct what was wrong, rather it was done to frustrate the president-elect or worse, if possible, deny Trump the presidency he won fair and square.Checked.

In that case, it's unlikely the Green Party was compelled by desire to correct what's wrong - but to make it wrong what was right.Checked.

This could ignite debate on what or who caused the recount to be mooted. It was reported initially one computer expert and an election activist (two persons that's all it took) had alleged that the vote counting machines could have been hacked (Haven't they always?) Checked.

So, the Green Party or Jill Stein hadn't themselves come across any evidence of fraud but just seized on what the computer expert and his activist friend had alleged. It couldn't be the Green Party or Jill Stein as both didn't complain about the the general election being rigged from beginning. People couldn't be blamed if they thought the Green Party was just a tool in this controversy. Checked.

The two who made the allegation could be working for George Soros or his son who are going all out to protect their new world order in collaboration with perhaps interested parties such as Harry Reid who seemed to hate Trump so much; the Democratic party or The Clinton foundation and last but not least, President Obama - all of who stand to lose heavily if Trump becomes president. Checked.

But then again, what's to stop the Republicans from asking for recounts when the Democrats candidates win in the future. Yes, when George W. Bush was leaving the White House after eight years, he left gentlemanly, and the Republican Party allowed Barack Hussein Obama to be inaugurated as the 44th president without asking third party to create trouble for then president -elect to frustrate him. But since the Democrats led by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi tried to play dirty, the American voters should punish them even more than their losing control of both Houses of congress and senate - these Democrats should not be allowed to win future elections as they are clearly working to aid the Muslim Brotherhood to take over America in cahoots with President Barack Hussein Obama! Checked.

Just imagine a candidate in a national election which he or she had never alleged was rigged or biased, filed for recount in the three states that was because the winner won with a razor-thin majorities. Hoping that the recounts would result in the winner losing the three states? Why they wanted to do that for? Or the good question is: why allow these sour grapes to abuse the system? Maybe they are not sour grapes, maybe they are pawns. Pawns are people or persons who allow themselves to be used as pawns. They do it for money, other quid pro quo, or are blackmailed due to their previous indebtedness to the puppet master, or threatened with bodily harm by the pawn master unless they comply; or, who knows, maybe Jill Stein thought if she could create a national controversy which depict her as the hero to uphold, sic, American values like what Obama has been singing praise for the last eight years, and propel her name to prominence to prepare herself to be lifted away from the stigma of being "not good enough" to "good enough," she could do better next time.And then again, who knows, she maybe good enough to be bank-rolled by George Soros in his next project in four years' time! Checked.

That shows what a corrupt and ambitious woman would do. As they say, hell has no fiery compared to a woman spurned - or shall we say, a woman unceremoniously rejected. Checked.

Doesn't it ever occurs to her that by trying to throw a spanner in people's works - that's how how it looks like - the voters or her supporters in these three states or other states will not have second thoughts about her wholesome characters she had been spewing out to them all these years that she's a fair and just person? Checked.

I am not Trump's relative or brother and had nothing to do with his campaign, but I want the voters or supporters everywhere in the US to not vote for this sore loser Jill Stein and her Green Party to spite them. Checked.

What they have done was uncalled-for, unethical, vicious, unfair, immoral and unforgivable! Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content



Jill Stein Of Green Party Stirs Hornets' Nest







The Drl Blog





























If Hillary Won Would She Ask For Recount In Key States? Checked.

By David Lang

The Green Party candidate Jill Stein was more than enthusiastic about having vote recount in key states - no! even worse than that; in fact, she's appearing as frantic as her house is going to be swept away by storm! Checked.

Jill Stein just had her chance to make a difference in the just concluded general election, and she blew it - or shall we say, the voters rejected her as she was found to be not good enough compared with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.Checked.

The question people want to ask her is why? Why she stirred up the hornets' nest when she's not going to benefit from any reduction in vote count for Donald Trump when the party that's clearly, automatically will be a beneficiary of any change in vote tally which may in an unlikely event Donald J. Trump is disqualified to become the 45th of the US, is Hillary Clinton of the Democratic Party! Checked.

What is she trying to prove - to get at Donald Trump for his win which everyone from Democrats to biased media establishment - and even world leaders - called it unexpected, unprecedented, unbelievable? Checked.

Or is she trying to prove even though she could not or could ever be president of the US because she's not good enough, she could and wanted to hurt hurt innocent people? What has Trump done to her to deserve her hatred and vengeance so destructive? She's not even directly Trump's rival. A distant rival maybe but not a rival in term of destroying his presidential dream. And Trump was not the cause of her failure at the election. Third party candidates as everyone knows never make it anywhere in the world. Checked.

So what exactly made her do it then? Power is not on list, as she she is unlikely to end up winning the general election (she only managed to win only one percent of the votes cast). Next on the list is she had gone over to the Democrat side, after being approached by the Hillary camp. You know what that will mean when the Clinton rope you in (like those 11 women who were led out like sheep to the slaughter house, to denounce Trump for grabbing their private parts and also kissing them on the mouths without their prior permission) to do something for them? Checked.

Even former Miss Universe Alicia Mashado who once was about to be axed by the pageant's executives because she was too fat and Trump intervened to save her participation in the Miss Universe contest on condition she exercised to reduce weight, saw more benefit in allying herself to Hillary Clinton who had done nothing for her whatsoever. Checked.

Another reason which seems likely was, George Sorros told her he bankrolled Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election' and probably gave her a hint he might be looking for another candidate to challenge President Donald J. Trump in four years' time. What can I do, sir, to deserve your support like Hillary did, she might have asked George Sorros? And the philanthropist answered: "Join my team to strengthened the new world order, stupid?" Checked.

The last reason that she might want the American people to think she's doing for is she's concerned about American values (like President Obama claimed to have abided by and have been promoting all these years)? That's not what she aimed to do, believe me. But if any of you opined that she's a sour grape, I may agree with you little bit.Checked.

And we should ask her what is her aim to achieve by refusing to accept the result even Hillary camp had no problem with? The Democratic Party nominee had even publicly accepted she lost to Donald and proclaimed "Donald j. Trump is our new president!" Checked.

By her action she had lent credence to those sore losers who kept trumpeting Hillary's excess popular votes which they claimed now surpassed 2,000,000 votes! Didn't she know that by keeping shouting Hillary chalked up more votes than Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton stalked up more votes than Donald Trump! they hoped to keep the matter alive, hoping some authorities of the election fraternity to step forward to agree to allow a recount in states that propelled Trump to the White House with a view to deploying gangsters to threaten electoral voters to vote against Trump and allow the Obama and George Sorros' New World Order camp to snatch the White House from Trump. Checked.

And Jill Stein was apparently "roped" in by the Democrat-Obama-George-Sorros team to play a central role; thus not giving themselves away as there's conflict of interest if they the Democrats themselves are demanding a recount. Checked.

By doing this (allowed herself to be used), Jill Stein forfeits her rights to run for president in future general election as a person who toys with the electoral college votes. I ask all American voters - just like I had asked American voters to reject Hillary Clinton for her being a stooge of President Obama even after he left office - to reject the traitor to our American values by her toying with electoral votes system which our forefather wisely put in place! Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content



Nov 19, 2016

I Was Not The Marrying Kind


But the good news is before I finished up for the day (night), I already had a pretty girl waiting to go out with me (after I had had my bath). This girl was the daughter of a nearby boutique owner. Of around 5" 2" tall and very pretty Chinese girl (many of my male companions who found it hard to find a girlfriend, would gaze heavenwards in gratitude for this eyecandy and would cherish her for life). There was this Indian Muslim's coffee shop operating next to my shop and this pretty girl prequented it to buy some drinks, and we got to know each other. She's among around a hundred girls who was unlucky to have fallen for me! I was informed by my sister who said the boutique owner's family felt unfair I had dropped their daughter. Indignantly they claimed their daughter had just married a millionaire no less! Checked.

Incidentally, the only regret I had with all the love confessed by those pretty girls I had to disappoint these pretty girls, all of them; I could not be their dreamboats as their hearts desire! Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content

Nov 17, 2016

Theresa May To Trump: Emulate Angela Merkel And Flood US With Muslims







The Drl Blog





























British People, Theresa May Is No Margaret Thatcher

As world leaders make a beeline to phone, meet or fix an appointment to meet to congratulate the new President-elect of the United States of America, Britain's Theresa May may have to wait a bit, a bit longer whether to just speak on the phone or have four-eye meeting with President-elect Donald Trump - compared to the lucks of other foreign leaders; even Nigel Farage, for that matter. Checked.

Well, nothing to worry about, actually. Teresa May will be accorded her privilege as close friends of the US, except that at this moment the transition to powers in the White House did seem to attract more attention than playing host to Mrs. May. Moreover, Britain's prime minister may have already congratulated Donald Trump though not personally, but through the media, when she warned (or advised, I am not sure, which) Trump not to carry out his promise to flush out Muslims from the US those already in and to vigorously interview and vet future Muslims applications to enter or visit the US.Checked.

And why is that? Why was she so interested in looking out for the Muslims the world over? To show compassion like Angela Merkel did (to the dismay and consternation of native Germans, not to mention causing the erosion of their rights and freedom to walk wherever they wish? Checked.

Is May confident (or complacent) that Britain is secured, no more bombing is going to happen because she, her government and British society in general, had done a good job in getting themselves into the good books of the Muslims? Checked.

Is she pitching her or Britain's expertise in Muslim control to Donald Trump? So that President Trump after he takes over the Oval Office could tap into to, sic, make America spared from Muslim violence, too? Checked.

Theresa May didn't mention how she wants Trump to go about keeping his election promise to deport Muslims from America: did she mean for Trump to carry on with Obama's policy which essentially caused the defeat of Hillary Clinton, Obama's stooge? Checked.

Is Theresa May and her government so afraid of Muslims, that she made it her business to be seen to look out for the welfare of Muslims wherever they are, by making it her first concern she would like Trump to address? Checked.

This is out of this world. Can you believe it - the prime minister of Great Britain (the country that once controlled half of the world) behaved like a Dhimmi. (Dhimmis refers to non- Muslims living in a Muslim-majority countries where they pays taxes to the Muslim authorities for protection ). The word Dhimmitude can have unlimited usage for the Muslims - depending on their scruples or the lack of them of the Muslim authorities, subject to needs. Checked.

The out-going US president Barack Hussein Obama, for instance (who admitted publicly in Middle Eastern media he is a practicing Muslim, though he's also known as a Christian, a non-practicing one, ironically), uses Dhimmitude to grant exemption from having to purchase his Obamacare to Muslims which he knew from day one the premiums would be beyond their reach and therefore shackle them to life of misery the white majority are now enduring. So, he cleverly (he's a genius) declared the Obamacare legislation only applies to non-Muslims. Just like that. Problem solved, for the Muslims. When activists or analysts questioned, what happened if the Muslims become sick and need an operation costing $20,000, how are they going to pay? From their life saving? "No," Obama said. The Federal Health Agency or Department - or whatever you call it - would pick up the tap. Problem solved. And where the Federal Health Agency money come from, may we ask? Checked.

Maybe this is nothing new to Theresa May, or in England?

So in short, a few hundreds thousands American Muslims - a tiny community - in a country of 300 millions, get to receive special treatment from the White House. All Americans, Whites, Hispanics or Asians, all are compelled to abide by Obamacare law failing which severe punishment awaits. Checked.

If you think since the American people accepted the inception of Obamacare when it was launched years ago, they only have themselves to blame, think again. These poor Americans are not to blame. They have been lied to by Obama using ambiguous words and terms to hide the true Obamacare they were pitching in the beginning by only telling half truth. But the decision to buy the Obamacare idea was partly caused by their trust in Democratic leaders such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton who clearly failed in their duties as Congressmen and and women, and senators - and, this is important, as human beings with conscience, to remind their fellow white Americans to be careful before they sign up.Checked.

In fact these white leaders fell into a pattern whereby Obama the genius cleverly pit Whites to cheat Whites, damned easy. Obama reasoned; if he used African-Americans to sell his snake oil to Whites not a single white will buy. I have been writing for months to tell the white Americans - you all have been taken for a ride by none other than your white congressmen and women and senators - I repeat, such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton. Don't elect them ever again; let them reap what they sow. Checked.

I am just glad my prolific writing - churning out articles after articles daily for months - imploring readers to reject Hillary Clinton because she's at beck and call of President Obama, and will continue to be so even after she becomes president, was not in vain. The Democrats have also lost both Houses of Congress! Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content





Nov 13, 2016

Israel Has No Choice But to Deter







The Drl Blog




























By:David Lang

October 21, 2012 Updated Today: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Obama Was And Is Not Or Will Ever Be Israel's Friend. Got it?

« « « angle quotation mark (left) ...

Previously Published In My MSNBC Newsvine column; Updated Today November 13,2016

David Rubin Macrermott May 1, 2013 9:46 pm Your comment is awaiting moderation. If Israel went as far as even giving a hint that Israel may, I stress may, be willing to compromise in order to try live up to the international expectation, or maybe demand by the United States at sometime later, the Jewish state would invariably unknowingly cause the avalanche of public opinion, strongly led by the European opinion, that will lead to loss of friends and supporters for which Israel needs to leverage on to prevent the fate that befell Col.Qaddafi’s Libya, Mubarak’s Egypt and currently Bashar Al-Assad’s Syria. Checked.

Once you show sign of capitulation, your enemies will be doubly stronger (whether misguidedly or not, it matters not); they become more daring and emboldened, and start to relish your looming downfall or demise. Checked.

People like the Arab league would love to do the Jewish state in if they could. But because they found Israelis stronger and deadly they recoiled and become discouraged and put their plans on the back burner for a while until they got the US and Europe solid on their side and the West miscalculated. Checked.

Israel would do well to know the Arab spring was not intended for the Arabs and Arab countries alone. Fortunately the Israeli Defense Forces’ (IDF) deterrent was too much for them or President Obama would not have shed so much tears if the Jews were sucked into a chaotic war with resurrected Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist. In fact he could nicely burnish his legacy for future generations … of Muslims to admire… for being their unrivaled hero; for his service in effectively delivering the God’s favorite children (or not) on a platter to the revengeful Arabs. Checked.

Don’t be so quick to dismiss my prediction just yet. President Obama meant harm to the Jewish state when he proclaimed that Israel has no choice but to reverse to Israel that existed from 1948 to 1967. He was quick to add though that there should negotiation and or land swap, but the principle of Israel before the 1967 war was not negotiable he said. Then when Jewish leaders reacted angrily, Obama cleverly hid behind the statement: “Actually what I said was nothing new; it had been the position of the United States for years.” Then he backtracked a little, and acted as if he genuinely made a mistake. May be he did. But who cares. The Palestinians didn’t. They seized upon it as if a new dawn had breathed life into their despair. I am not saying Obama was evil that day when the faux pas occurred but this man just fumbled and stumbled like he did during most of his first term in office. Checked.

Honestly he was clueless with everything. He never thought things through before executing them. He’s harmful to the Jew people enough by just being clueless and fumbling. He only came to his sense only after it was too late. Take the Iran issue as an example; his sustained opposition to Israelis attack on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear installations until finally diminished the effectiveness of such attacks. Now Obama doesn’t have to oppose the airstrike; it will automatically be opposed by the Israelis themselves as they had become pointless. Prime minister Benjamin Netayahu was wise in not listening to Obama but reserved the right to make his own decision That probably saved Israel from the slippery road to untold insecurity, if not eventual demise or shackled by the US. The plan by the Arab league could cause a lot of trouble for Israel eventually, especially if the plan of the so-called land for peace was endorsed by John Kerry, the new US secretary of state. Checked.

John Kerry is a well respected leader; his words usually carry a lot weight. Obama was shrewd in enlisting Kerry to burnish his plans. Do you know why Obama shies away from employing black people, which he should as he’s black himself. But that would not enhance the effectiveness of his administration. He managed to ride roughshod over pretty much, if not the whole, of American society by using whites to pit against whites and whites are very effective and loyal to whoever provide the largess. And that’s how he became president of the world only super power … by being adept to using his resources – white people. Checked.

I don’t know if Obama was going to carry out his plan, like his plan of getting rid of Mubarak, which he thought was good for the world but how it turned later after he was done (with Mubarak) he was powerless to rectify. Now the present president that replaced Mubarak, Mursi, who vowed to change Egypt for the better could not stop himself from being greedy for more powers. Any Egyptians who stand in his way will be dealt with his way – by removing them from office! While this was going on, and the Egyptian people are suffering, President Obama surprisingly stayed silent. This should give Israeli leader something to ponder on. Stay away from Obama’s scheme or promise of help or you will be sorry. Checked.

Demonstrate to the Palestinians you would never compromise with the Jewish people’s welfare and security. Good example of what should be the correct way of actions and defense was how firmly the IDF dealt with the Arab spring-like demonstration from the direction of Syria when they tried to storm the fence not long ago. Normally in that type of scenarios the Europeans would pretend to try to be a mediator and asked Israel to sit down for talks … to get the Palestinians to stop agitating! Had Israel foolishly agreed, by now the Israelis could be embroiled in an endless fight with Islamists from all over the world like the Syrians are right now. If one inch was given then, then God may have to save his children. I can already imagine what happens. The whole world’s resources would be deployed to help the Palestinians bring down the Israeli government and then either send the Jews to the sea (which was their stated goal during the famous six-days war), or ...call for talks (don't they always?). Checked.

Every body would then head to Geneva, where else for this type of things, and sit down around a table arranged by the U.S. and E.U.whilst pretending to yearn for world peace between Israel and the Palestinians. At first glance, I agree they seemingly want to help the Jews and the Muslims to have peace. But glance again, and trace the actions of these two mediators all the way back, and you would realize on which side they are. The Palestinians', of course. Checked.

There are two reasons to explain their behaviors. The Europeans are what they call Dhimmas (living in fear of Muslims or Islam itself) or Dhimmitude in their own countries. Another good analogy is to compare the Europeans to victims of gangsters who give money in exchange for protection. Checked.

Obama's exemption of Muslims from Obamacare legislation is also analogous to Dhimmitude. Why these European leaders were and are so afraid of Muslim violence nobody knows. Maybe is akin to the Chinese who enjoy life so much in China that they if possible they want to live a long life. Similarly the Europeans want to avoid drunk driving as it may lead to accidents with concomitant death as much as they want to avoid getting into the bad books of the Muslims. Checked.

This is the reality that the Israeli government and people should never forget. They are ...alone! People may point out, though, all US presidents - past and present - pledge to protect the Jewish state. Of course. But, hypothetically, let's see what will happen if, say, Israel which is on the verge of defeat by the combined Arab army, turns to President Obama for help. Obama comes to Israel's aid ... in time. I mentioned in; actually I should have said almost too late. President Obama did come to Israeli's aid but not at once. He pretends to shout stern warning to the Arab league "The United States will protect its Israeli security. Thank God. But when the aid does arrive, Israeli position is so unsustainable that they have no choice but to agree to whatever Obama decided for them. And then comes the costs. The Jewish people pledge to follow every instruction dished out by their savior. And, of course, Obama wants to humiliates them by asking them to make concessions to the Palestinians - including agreeing to reverse Israel border to that of before 1967 war! See what I mean. My advice to Jews is: deter and be smart. See to it only good and loyal young men are drafted into the army and air force… to keep the IDF what it has always been, and must be, the protector of the Jewish people – by keeping its deterrent intact. Period. Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content