-->

Judge Roy Moore Like Candidate Trump Fell Victim To Women

SCARY HORROR MOVIE! A CREEPY MANIAC KIDNAPS AND RAPES WOMEN! The Inflict...

THE DRL BLOG



Links You May Like

Why Tun Dr Mahathir Was So Powerful When He was Prime Minister?>More Here

How To Stop Drinking Without Stopping!>Read More Here

Opportunist Writers From Indian Community> Read More

Judge Roy Moore Like Candidate Trump Fell Victim To Women>More here

Israel Can Stop Palestinians' Roket Firings From Gaza (Once And For All) >More

Contaminated Blood Coursing Through Muslim Veins A No-No>More

Clinton Or Trump>More

How You Intend To Vote in November?>More

Obama Took The Crown>More Here

Hannah Yeoh Won't Apologize For Wearing Headscarf>More..

Abdullah Rebuffed Them>More

Lim's Horrendous Success>More Here

Lim Guan Eng A Phenomenon>More

Even The Once Mighty British Seem To Have Thrown In The Towel>Read More

Clash Of Titans> More Here

Not Easy Being DAP>Read More

Pak Lah Was Too Kind To Do What Was Expected Of Him>More Here

President Trump: James Comey, You Are Fired>More

Not Easy Being MCA Leaders>More

A Commander-in-chief Who Doesn't Act Like One>More..

Nobel Prize Winners>More..

Trump Had Better Keep His Promise>More

Warning For The Rich And Powerful>Read More

Ananda Khrishnan Earned Bumiputra Status For For Indians In Malaysia>More?

MCA Must Demand Return Of All Its Traditional Seats>Read More

A British Adventurer Who Became King By His Own Hand>Read More

Where's The MAS Flight MH370 Now>More..

The Greatest Medicine Man Ever Lived>Read More

Can President Trump Single-handedly Take On His Enemies And Win>More here

Israel Can Stop Rocket Firings From Gaza (Once And For All) >Read More...

By David Lang

The following stories may fire your imagination, pique your interest. Some say 1MDB is Malaysia's Sovereign Wealth fund; to others they asked what wealth fund when its total capitalization is just One million ringgit? But, then again, if you think you can look down on the pet idea of the Malaysian prime minister, think again. His idea has the potential of turning the now world famous - or shall we say, infamous - 1Malaysia Development Berhad into a giant corporation you can ever imagine - even bigger than Bill Gate's Microsoft! At least, it could be, if the original course is stayed. It was supposed to inspire Malaysians to think big besides advance growth, according to its slogans screaming out of giant bill boards throughout the country. 'Backed' by the finance ministry who owns it - which means money will never be the problem - it can only succeed. But..it didn't. It failed! That's why it may have piqued many people's curiosity. How can a company flush with cash and can borrow any amount (billions) anytime could fail? Well, this may be in line with your thinking. People have seen since its inception - I mean after its name was changed in 1999 from Trengganu Investment Authority (TIA) to the present - it hasn't done any business! I have used present tense deliberately. It hasn't done any business yet. I mean if you are in business you need to make profit or find ways to make profit. Or close shop. Oh, I had heard about their filings of tax returns and hiring of a couple of internationally known auditors to sign off on their balance sheets; but these concerned only the company's borrowings and interests to be paid. Two massive bonds were issued to the tune of $7 billions. To buy up power plants. Again I want to say if you are in business to make money even investing in independent Power Plants, it should be done with the view to making a profit. The decision may be long term or short term, it doesn't matter, it has to make money, or no deal. May be they have done the right thing. Maybe luck was not on their side. Still, the amount is staggering. I didn't know having or managing so much money can be a problem! But many - especially the Malays - have not given up hope yet. Yes, may be the durians are just ripening; may be they need time and may fall soon!




Flying bat in a marquee

This is a automatic time























Recent Articles

This video is presented courtesy of Sally Page:







Malaysia's Vision 2020

By:David Lang

Malaysia is supposed to be on its way to becoming a developed nation, by the year 2020. Will she make it (in less than five years -tick-tuck, tick-tuck)? There is no doubt the year 2020 is coming whether the country is ready or not, and if that will be the only requirement then Malaysia will attain that developed nation status on schedule. There is a question, though, Will Malaysia, or Malaysians, for that matter, be ready for that status as far as their affluence, quality of life's concern? Currently Malaysia's GNI per capita stood at US$10060. According to the World Bank high income economies are those with GNI per capita of US$12,745. And until Malaysians earn much more to be there, the developed nation status may not be achieved even by the year 2020. The futility of declaring a country a high income country when it's not, achieves nothing. May be even counter-productive; it lulls the country into false sense of success and premature celebration. Don't forget China reportedly overtook Japan as the world's second largest economy, but in actual fact China's citizens' ca pita income is a fraction of the incomes of the Japanese who earn $37,000. Chinese incomes range from $13,000. China's gross domestic product, taken as a whole, may beat Japan's, but in term of quality of life, and GNI per capita income, the criteria for a developed nation status, China still has a lot of catching up to do. That's why China still qualifies as recipient of Japan's economic aid meant for developing countries. Comparing with the Chinese per capita domestic product, Malaysia is even worse off. Unless the government bucks up and rushes to create more wealth for its citizens, the Vision 2020 dream may remain just that ..a dream.

Jun 29, 2013

'MCA go home' vs 'Where was DAP 13 years ago?' at Jonker Walk

'MCA go home' vs 'Where was DAP 13 years ago?' at Jonker Walk
What?! Gan qualified his being there as a survey, not to protest? Let alone to lead the protest? Did Mr. Gan Tian Loo realize that the MCA protest carries more weight than DAP protest many times over. The state government, being UMNO-led government, considers the DAP as the opposition working hand-in-hand with PAS and PKR to oust UMNO from power, rescinding the directive on the request from DAP leaders will make the party even more popular. I thought, at first, here come the MCA, finally to do what it's supposed to do. Then the expected  happened. He got cold feet. The reporter who covered the protest reported Gan was suddenly cautious . He was like ..."I'm here to lend my support to..the .. no, wait! I am not here to support the traders - but just to do a quick survey! But I am glad to be standing here with the protesters but reporters, please put it down in black and white I am not, I repeat, am not here as part of the protest. This is the reason the MCA was shunned, I mean has been shunned by the Chinese. They do not represent the Chinese anymore. They cannot get things done anymore unlike in the old days. Gan admitted his meeting with the chief minister was fruitless, but would keep trying. Keep trying for what? He should stop embarrassing the MCA and reducing its credibility further by continuing to beg despite being rebuffed earlier. Again, this proved that the Malaysian Chinese Association has really completely lost its usefulness. If a small matter like Jonker Walk closure was beyond its power then, that 's it.

Jun 22, 2013

Anwar: 505 rally will go on - Nation | The Star Online

Anwar: 505 rally will go on - Nation | The Star Online

Black 505: Live updates - Nation | The Star Online

Black 505: Live updates - Nation | The Star Online

Feb 15, 2013

How To Repair Your Own Refrigerator And Save A Bundle





when I received a call the other day (night) from a Miss Lee complaining about her fridge not working (she noticed the temperature inside the fridge was warm comparable to room temperature), I asked her to check if the fridge's power switch was at on or off?

Dec 30, 2018

EU Denies Plot To Keep UK In EU Forever





The EU may have unwittingly overplayed their role and may have to regret if the UK crashes out on 29 March 2019!

By David Lang

December 29, 2018 Updated Today:June 3, 2019

The European commission president rejected claims of a plot to keep the UK in the EU

Finally, the cat is out of the bag. The EU is suspected of doing everything possible to prevent the UK leaving the union. This was denied by the European commission president Jean-Claude Juncker but instead actually it confirmed that there was such a possibility. Surely he doesn't enjoy promoting fake news if there's no substance to it. We don't forget how the EU as represented by its chief negotiator Michel Barnier wouldn't concede an inch over the Irish backstop, thereby leaving the UK with no choice but to leaving on WTO terms or no-deal which the Remainers vowed to prevent at all cost. And Juncker and Ireland's taoiseach Leo Varadkar in quick succession also threatened to hold Theresa May accountable over her agreement that there would be no return of the hard border between Northern Ireland and Ireland which they managed to trick or coax her to agree to in December; although Juncker did not elaborate further, it's widely believed the Remainers in the Labour party and in the Conservatives party could be working together with Brussels to keep the UK in the EU; the EU perforce underwrites all the costs incurred in the exercise; as the benefit of UK membership is worth billions per year, a billion or two or even 10-billion bribes to the Remainers - whether the cross-party MPs, civil service heads, business association heads, or other government institutional chiefs, will be money well spent indeed.
So the fight for people's vote, new referendum, vow to do everything to stop no-deal Brexit, were not done in UK's interests but their own. If these Remainder traitors managed to pull it off and the UK is stuck in the EU, the EU will be entitled to receive, and continue to receive billions after billions in member contributions from Britain which is the world's fifth largest economy; or if they managed to ensure the UK leaves with a deal and by extension, the Eu gets paid 39bn sterling, it could be expected to gladly share 10bn or more of that with the Remainers inside the UK. This may sound far-fetched; it's not. If they have not been promised this lucrative reward, it's doubtful these mutinous Tory MPs in the backbench, including those in the Labour party, the civil service chiefs, the police chiefs, bank chiefs, business association chiefs, chamber of commerce chiefs, the army and air force chiefs, would work so hard to try to stop Brexit--as if their very lives depend on it..except they have other unknown reasons. But don't forget that if they and the Eu succeeded, Britain would end up like a colony or a vassal state or rule takers sans any rights to be part of the process to formulate rules or laws, so their actions were not for the good of Britain. Period.
Don't forget 39bn is more than enough for the EU to keep their promise to pay all Remainers inside the UK if they can prove they did contribute in some way to the success of stopping the no-deal Brexit. As this is a one-time spending--the EU can be expected to spend even in excess of the 39bn. If the UK is successfully stopped from leaving as a member it needs to pay billions in annual contribution to the EU budget. So, the 39b spent on the traitorous Remainers would be worth every penny!
You can be sure this statement by Jean-Claude Juncker is not issued for fun but to nip the assertion in the bud. They are worried if allowed to go viral it may anger even the die-hard Remainers and transform them into leavers! Offers of millions may be tempting, but not all who support remain did it for money.
Already, a lot of people are not satisfied that what Mrs May brought back from Brussels was a fairly-negotiated deal, after it was revealed "one of Michel Barnier's goals was to let the remaining 27 EU members realize that "leaving the EU is not a good idea!"
According to Sir Simon Fraser, quote: "the UK would have to accept that the EU will impose an economic and political price tag for Brexit, partly to make it clear to other EU member states that 'it's not a good idea to leave.'"
In conclusion, according to the fine prints in the Mrs May's so-called Brexit deal, if carried out, will leave Britain vastly diminished and may never rise again.
If true, everyone should confront Mrs May and demand an explanation. Why she's prepared to do in her beloved motherland. How much is it worth to sell out her own country? She's far from being a benighted peasant so she should know what will happen to the prestige and honor of Her Majesty The Queen as the head of the commonwealth when England or the Great Britain was reduced to a dependency state of the EU with having to follow all EU rules but have no say in the making of those rules!

Skip to Content

This site complies with the new EU policy on cookies and privacy policy. Or GDPR which was implemented by the EU recently, and which all publishers must comply. If you continue to use our website and Google products and technologies, it means you are OK with the EU requirement. If you are OK or just want to learn more about this European Union's regulation, click here.

Dec 22, 2018

EA SPORTS UFC 3 | Bruce Lee(CAF) v Yuri Boyka V

Theresa May Still Has A Way Out





Theresa May Should Return To Her Original Position That NO-deal Is Better Than Bad Deal!

By David Lang

December 22, 2018 Updated Today:December22, 2018

Theresa May Still Has A way Out

If I were the prime minister Theresa May, I would utilize the limited time that she has before the January 14..and take a relook at the agreement she had reached with the EU --to see if the deal could be better. Or was it what it says on the tin or what she's fond to claim..that this deal is the best; it stops the free movement and gives back control of our borders and destiny. If it does, fine. Go ahead submit to the Commons on 14th January. If it does not, go ahead to have the vote anyway but don't push too hard for it to be passed - just relax and let the MPs do their duties. Leave it to fate -- if the the deal is voted down, good, count yourself lucky; for if the withdrawal agreement is approved, you and England are both done for. You will be blamed for selling out your own country, though unknowingly (she would not be hanged but given life sentence for lesser charge of incompetence). Britain will be a dependency of the EU forever without freedom to strike any deals with the world unless permitted by the EU masters.
Judging by the behaviors and statements exhibited by the EU almost 24/7 daily, it's safe to assume that the EU could only countenance an agreement that adequately insulates the EU from the harms posed by Brexit and also ensures Britain don't outshine the EU in all sectors. According to Sir Simon Fraser, quote: “I am not a catastrophist, but let us be clear: this is going to be an incredibly difficult, tough and complex negotiation. One of the objectives of the EU side is to make it absolutely clear to anyone else thinking of leaving the EU that this is not a good idea."
It can be assumed that the EU forced May's hand to take the only deal on the table or leave it. Apparently May took it as she had no choice -- the clock is ticking. She took the deal. This deal which was described by two Bloomberg columnists was too good for the EU and therefore too bad for the UK, making it rather pointless for the UK to trigger Article 50 and negotiate hard to exit the EU for even less benefit than staying put. The Bloomberg columnist describes the deal that Michel Barnier granted Theresa May, or Theresa May got from the EU was designed to pour cold water on similar idea by any EU 27 members!
So, granted then the withdrawal agreement that Theresa May brought back from the EU was worthless. It didn't deliver like what it says on the tin. So where it leaves Theresa May then? She should keep her word to submit the deal to the Commons on the January 14 but to refrain from fighting hard for the yes vote. The best scenario for her is the deal is rejected; so that she can start working for no deal (which will whitewash her failure to obtain a better deal for the UK. Any fallout on her from her now confirmed not best deal but in fact worse deal, can be minimized by supporting the no-deal Brexit which she never abandoned but supported it earlier when she declared "No-deal is better than bad deal."
I say probably. There's still a chance to get out of your quandary, and even be praised for your loyalty to your country. Firmly reiterate your stand there will be no 2nd referendum --if any of your cabinet members try to promote it, nip the proposal in the bud. Firmly give orders to prepare for no-deal Brexit. If asked why she seemed less and less enthusiastic about her own "best" deal, just say after taking into consideration what others including your own party MPs have said about the deal including what the EU and Leo Varadkar have insisted that there will be no deal without the backstop, and no 12-month backstop, you explain your position haven't changed, that a no-deal is better than a bad deal.
With no deal Brexit you would have fulfilled your promise to deliver the Brexit that people wanted - what it says on the tin, if you will. You will not be consigned to the dustbin of history for betraying your own office and Great Britain. You would have saved 39b which could be used to defray costs to sustain Britain for a while.
Your cabinet members could argue for the money to be paid anyhow, for their own private reasons. But stand firm and argue we are going to need every penny we can get to help minimize the effects from leaving the EU without a deal. Refer to your Tory colleagues's stand that the 39b will be paid only when we get the agreement to leave the EU. Stop being swayed by threats from the EU and the Irish Republic who have themselves to blame for making the deal look so bad (in order) to deter copycats among the EU's 27 members, but at the same time also unknowingly make it unpalatable for the Tory MPs. Checked. Never entertain any request to reopen the negotiation which they earlier ruled out, even though tempting. Stick to your statement: "No deal is better than bad deal." Checked.

Skip to Content

This site complies with the new EU policy on cookies and privacy policy. Or GDPR which was implimented by the EU recently, and which all publishers must comply. If you continue to use our website and Google products and technologies, it means you are ok with the EU requirement. If you are ok or just want to learn more about this European Union's regulation, click here.

Nov 8, 2018

Israel Can Easily Stop Palestinian Rockets







By David Lang

October 28, 2018 Updated Today: November 03, 2018

This could be it! The solution to the cross-border rocket firings. Just make a statement that Israel is to consider moving the Palestinians away from its border - for security reason - and watch Hamas recoil in fear. Checked.

Even the Palestinian president can be 'forced' to go along with the plan, to which he would have no problem agreeing as it will diminish Hamas and its influence (hold) over the Gaza populace. Checked.
Even Europe will fall in line as they too, despite being pro-Hamas in their veiled actions, would want to avoid bloodshed and harm to innocent children. Israel has the means to do it. If they could attempt to bomb Iran which is so far away, mass moving the Palestinians will be a piece of cake. Checked.
Maybe, who knows, just say they toy with the idea, will be enough to stop the rockets that the Israeli army, navy and its fabled air force have struggled to accomplish. Checked.
Don't forget once Hamas realized they are doomed they will do the right thing! Checked.
Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content



Nov 3, 2018

EA SPORTS UFC 2 - Bruce Lee v Jean Claude Van Damme II - THE RE-MATCH @6...

Yuri Boyka Vs Tony Jaa Intense and Incredible Fight







By David Lang

October 28, 2018 Updated Today: November 03, 2018

Yuri Boyka vs Tony Jaa UFC fight was billed as Intense and Incredible. What an appropriate title. From start to finish, brutal punches and kinckings were delivered non-stop, not a second was wasted to inflict maximum damage to one another between these two. Although at first it looked like Yuri Boyka was going to KO his opponent, but Tony Jaa it seemed never planned to be knocked out so easily, and planned to slug it out with his opponent till the end of five rounds if need be, to wrest the title from him. That was the obvious intent - it doesn't matter if he fails or succeeds. But of course, if he doesn't believe that he he has what it takes he wouldn't be in this fight. Hence the incredible staying power no matter what his opponent threw at him - kicks or punches, elbows to the chin or back kicks to the stomach, front kicks to the face - which repeatedly sent him to the canvas but he kept getting up as if immune to the damage inflicted, to stay in the fight. From round #2, though, he started to hit back for blows he received, and Boyka was stunned. But Boyka kept up the pressure because he was bigger (Boyka could fight in light heavy weight and heavy weight divisions because of his size). When matched up with Tony Jaa, of course, he was more daring as he was more confident of victory or trashing his opponent. He kept delivering deadly blows and sending Tony Jaa to the canvas, and he looked more and more likely to retain his title but..Tony Jaa kept rising and also knocking down Boyka too himself, the fight started to become intense. The slug-fest was no-holds-barred, every imaginable blows were exchanged, by now both Tony Jaa and Yuri Boyka were bloodied and clearly exhausted, and who would best who was anybody's guess.

Somestimes it looked like Boyka was going to go down, and sometimes Tony Jaa but to their credit, both still stood their grounds. And both, despite receiving repeated blows to their bodies and heads and it looked like the fight would be over, showed no sign of going down and staying down. Sheer desire to win kept them going, and both almost ended up dead or crippled.
Before the fight ended, Boyka knocked Tony Jaa down and followed up with multiple blows to the face but incredible, he managed to push Boyka away and stood up to send Boyka crashing down to the canvas with swinging kick from the ground (this type of kicking is double the normal kicks' damage is the trademark of Bruce Lee which he used to disastrous end for his opponents). But Boyka was no pushover himself, he also recovered fast to stave off Tony Jaa from finishing him off by throwing some punches that bought him time to get his giddiness under control and continue the fight. Then he kept getting knocked down by Tonny Jaa (who by now felt that victory was within reach (he was so confident that he even demonstrated what he could do to his opponent with his elbows, which was viewed rather unnecessary and wasteful of precious seconds which he could use to follow up and finish off his opponent), but each time though the bells saved Boyka.
When the fight resumed, Boyka was no more almost knocked out a few minute rest had somewhat restored him and he went all out to dispose of his opponent. He (who is called the invincible or the most complete fighter of all time) gave no chance to Tony Jaa by knocking him down again and again; and when it looked like it's all over, he was momentarily motionless, the incredible Tony Jaa stirred and got up to continue. From then onward the slug-fest became more intense and incredible. Both just stood there face to face and threw everything they got at each other. Boyka was still dominating - kept sending Tony Jaa to the canvas - hen Tony Jaa caught him with an uppercut to his chin and he went down for the last time. Overcame by feeling of triumph, Tony Jaa ran around the Octagon screaming his delight as the new champion. And that was just that - the end of an intense and incredible fight which will be remembered for a long time. Checked. Click this link to watch the video. Recommended! By the way this video belongs to xcH10x1 or Octagon Ring owner. Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content



The Warrior From Thailand







By David Lang

October 28, 2018 Updated Today: November 03, 2018

I recently stumbled upon UFC mixed martial arts fights - both championship and game play - and have been unable to turn away from since.

Most fights feature exponents -surprise surprise - who I believed were only good in the make-believe realm of movies. Although these martial movie actors - such as John Van Damme, Steven Seagal, Jet li or Donny Yen, Tony Jaa, and so on, to name a few are supposed to be able to and did in their movies..take on much bigger-sized villains or multiple villains and still come out tops, convincingly, I believe they burst on the UFC vanue at Madison Square Garden to take on the best in the mixed martial arts world to earn their stripes (legitimacy) as martial arts exponents to show to their fans that their triumph over their opponents in the movies are no flukes they can fight or land those killer punches or flying kicks even in real life. So I decided to watch and have been doing so everyday since fascinated to no end.
As I expected, most if not all of these movie star martial artists were clobbered right and proper. All defeated by mostly knockouts.
However, lest I forget to mention: there were three or four martial arts movie actors who did prove heir martial arts skills. The most notable among them was Chuck Norris (who claimed to be six times world martial arts champion); Bruce Lee (of 'Big Boss fame'; Tony Jaa the star of 'Ong Bak'; Jet Li (Wong Fei Hoong) Donny Yen (of Grand Master fame), and of course, John Van Damme (who 'destroyed' Tong Poe in 'Kick Boxer'), and Tong Po who ironically was used by all martial arts movie actors as the man to defeat to earn legitimacy to their claims as martial arts champions.
He /div>
Why was Tong Po fighting in UFC rings, I had wondered at first. Wasn't he a has-been as a professional boxer as we have heard of him for quite sometime already. He should be too old to take on anybody and survive by now. But when he matched up with Tony Jaa I knew the truth why he was still fighting. His age was not much older than Tony Jaa's.
Surprise! Surprise! The Real Maccoy of Thai boxing who was used as standard for martial arts competency, was no match for Tony Jaa! By the way, this video belongs xcH10x1 or UFC for which we say thank you. Click to watch the video
But this in no way meant to demean Tong Po, the top or greatest of MuayThai exponent once. Anybody can lose a match or get knocked out if got hit with a big kick to your head or neck or your rival's uppercut hit your jaw. But what I am saying here is Tony Jaa's win over Tong Po was no fluke. But in any contest there is only one winner...and loser. The fight was explosive and deadly, and both of them kept delivering deadly punches or kicks without relent at all throughout the match - not a single minute was wasted during the two rounds that lasted to try to knock out each other. Tong Po was bigger he towered over Tony Jaa, and you can't blame any spectators for feeling afraid for the smaller man although he stood toe to toe with a much bigger and a deadly boxer at that receiving repeated punishing hits which Tong Po rained on him nonstop. I almost couldn't believe that Tony Jaa could take so much punishment. Numerous times he was kicked down numerous times he got up and continued as if he was not human but a robot in human skin! However brutal Tong Po was in his hasty attempt to finish him off, he stayed and fought until finally he prevailed - he brought down Tong with a deadly kick to the neck with force that literally propelled Tong Po head first to the ground - and he was knocked out. The voice of narrator of the Octagon could be heard loud and clear: "IT'S ALL OVER!" And the fight ended in about 3 minutes of round two.
My God! What a brutal fight. I have never seen a fight like this; or a man who could take so much punishment to (in order to win.
Chuck Norris fight with Bruce Lee can cause your adrenaline to run riot, but this was the mother of brutal fights of all time. The slug-fest sight could even overwhelm a weak heart spectator to collapse and die.
Tony Jaa was depicted in his spectacularly successful movie Ong Bak as a killer martial arts exponent who could defeat multiple opponents who are much bigger than him, at the same time. Of course, it was a movie. Remember how after watching Tong Po kill John Van Damme's make-believe brother in a championship fight in Thailand, he sought help from an old martial arts expert in a jungle hideout where he trained hard to equip himself with a deadly skill fight Tong Po in the ring in Bangkok and to emphatically defeat him. John Van Damme was the producer and directer of the movie. So he has the power to tell the script writer to pen it in a way that John Van Damme ended up as the destroyer of Tong Po, as a matter of course. John Van Damme was lucky - he not only had talents he also had money (to fund the movie). And got the right to dictate who defeats whom! Tong Po was probably told to not fight to win but lose!
Now where were we? Oh Ya, Tony Jaa after bursting into professional fighting in UFC's Octagon ring not too long ago had proven again and again that his actions in the movie are no flukes. He could do it in real life - like he was invited to Japan and Korea to give live demonstrations to sold out audiences wherever he went. He's indeed a phenomenon as a mixed martial
The fight began with both sides launching fierce kicks and punching to the face of their opponents. There were five five-minute rounds to finish off each other. Unlike the international boxing where boxers fight for 15 rounds and still none the worst for their bodies and faces, mixed martial arts cannot have more than 5 rounds or someone is going to end up dead. Yes, unlike the international boxing martial arts or mixed martial fights are deadly - sometimes the fights could even end in first round when one boxer is knocked out.
Next, I will write about other great boxers such as Bruce Lee and Ronda Rousey, especially, who won 10 fights in a row ! Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content