-->

Judge Roy Moore Like Candidate Trump Fell Victim To Women

Fire Serpent Full Movie | Monster Movies | Disaster Movies | The Midnigh...

THE DRL BLOG



Links You May Like

Why Tun Dr Mahathir Was So Powerful When He was Prime Minister?>More Here

How To Stop Drinking Without Stopping!>Read More Here

Opportunist Writers From Indian Community> Read More

Judge Roy Moore Like Candidate Trump Fell Victim To Women>More here

Israel Can Stop Palestinians' Roket Firings From Gaza (Once And For All) >More

Contaminated Blood Coursing Through Muslim Veins A No-No>More

Clinton Or Trump>More

How You Intend To Vote in November?>More

Obama Took The Crown>More Here

Hannah Yeoh Won't Apologize For Wearing Headscarf>More..

Abdullah Rebuffed Them>More

Lim's Horrendous Success>More Here

Lim Guan Eng A Phenomenon>More

Even The Once Mighty British Seem To Have Thrown In The Towel>Read More

Clash Of Titans> More Here

Not Easy Being DAP>Read More

Pak Lah Was Too Kind To Do What Was Expected Of Him>More Here

President Trump: James Comey, You Are Fired>More

Not Easy Being MCA Leaders>More

A Commander-in-chief Who Doesn't Act Like One>More..

Nobel Prize Winners>More..

Trump Had Better Keep His Promise>More

Warning For The Rich And Powerful>Read More

Ananda Khrishnan Earned Bumiputra Status For For Indians In Malaysia>More?

MCA Must Demand Return Of All Its Traditional Seats>Read More

A British Adventurer Who Became King By His Own Hand>Read More

Where's The MAS Flight MH370 Now>More..

The Greatest Medicine Man Ever Lived>Read More

Can President Trump Single-handedly Take On His Enemies And Win>More here

Israel Can Stop Rocket Firings From Gaza (Once And For All) >Read More...

By David Lang

The following stories may fire your imagination, pique your interest. Some say 1MDB is Malaysia's Sovereign Wealth fund; to others they asked what wealth fund when its total capitalization is just One million ringgit? But, then again, if you think you can look down on the pet idea of the Malaysian prime minister, think again. His idea has the potential of turning the now world famous - or shall we say, infamous - 1Malaysia Development Berhad into a giant corporation you can ever imagine - even bigger than Bill Gate's Microsoft! At least, it could be, if the original course is stayed. It was supposed to inspire Malaysians to think big besides advance growth, according to its slogans screaming out of giant bill boards throughout the country. 'Backed' by the finance ministry who owns it - which means money will never be the problem - it can only succeed. But..it didn't. It failed! That's why it may have piqued many people's curiosity. How can a company flush with cash and can borrow any amount (billions) anytime could fail? Well, this may be in line with your thinking. People have seen since its inception - I mean after its name was changed in 1999 from Trengganu Investment Authority (TIA) to the present - it hasn't done any business! I have used present tense deliberately. It hasn't done any business yet. I mean if you are in business you need to make profit or find ways to make profit. Or close shop. Oh, I had heard about their filings of tax returns and hiring of a couple of internationally known auditors to sign off on their balance sheets; but these concerned only the company's borrowings and interests to be paid. Two massive bonds were issued to the tune of $7 billions. To buy up power plants. Again I want to say if you are in business to make money even investing in independent Power Plants, it should be done with the view to making a profit. The decision may be long term or short term, it doesn't matter, it has to make money, or no deal. May be they have done the right thing. Maybe luck was not on their side. Still, the amount is staggering. I didn't know having or managing so much money can be a problem! But many - especially the Malays - have not given up hope yet. Yes, may be the durians are just ripening; may be they need time and may fall soon!




Flying bat in a marquee

This is a automatic time























Recent Articles

This video is presented courtesy of Sally Page:







Malaysia's Vision 2020

By:David Lang

Malaysia is supposed to be on its way to becoming a developed nation, by the year 2020. Will she make it (in less than five years -tick-tuck, tick-tuck)? There is no doubt the year 2020 is coming whether the country is ready or not, and if that will be the only requirement then Malaysia will attain that developed nation status on schedule. There is a question, though, Will Malaysia, or Malaysians, for that matter, be ready for that status as far as their affluence, quality of life's concern? Currently Malaysia's GNI per capita stood at US$10060. According to the World Bank high income economies are those with GNI per capita of US$12,745. And until Malaysians earn much more to be there, the developed nation status may not be achieved even by the year 2020. The futility of declaring a country a high income country when it's not, achieves nothing. May be even counter-productive; it lulls the country into false sense of success and premature celebration. Don't forget China reportedly overtook Japan as the world's second largest economy, but in actual fact China's citizens' ca pita income is a fraction of the incomes of the Japanese who earn $37,000. Chinese incomes range from $13,000. China's gross domestic product, taken as a whole, may beat Japan's, but in term of quality of life, and GNI per capita income, the criteria for a developed nation status, China still has a lot of catching up to do. That's why China still qualifies as recipient of Japan's economic aid meant for developing countries. Comparing with the Chinese per capita domestic product, Malaysia is even worse off. Unless the government bucks up and rushes to create more wealth for its citizens, the Vision 2020 dream may remain just that ..a dream.

Jun 29, 2013

'MCA go home' vs 'Where was DAP 13 years ago?' at Jonker Walk

'MCA go home' vs 'Where was DAP 13 years ago?' at Jonker Walk
What?! Gan qualified his being there as a survey, not to protest? Let alone to lead the protest? Did Mr. Gan Tian Loo realize that the MCA protest carries more weight than DAP protest many times over. The state government, being UMNO-led government, considers the DAP as the opposition working hand-in-hand with PAS and PKR to oust UMNO from power, rescinding the directive on the request from DAP leaders will make the party even more popular. I thought, at first, here come the MCA, finally to do what it's supposed to do. Then the expected  happened. He got cold feet. The reporter who covered the protest reported Gan was suddenly cautious . He was like ..."I'm here to lend my support to..the .. no, wait! I am not here to support the traders - but just to do a quick survey! But I am glad to be standing here with the protesters but reporters, please put it down in black and white I am not, I repeat, am not here as part of the protest. This is the reason the MCA was shunned, I mean has been shunned by the Chinese. They do not represent the Chinese anymore. They cannot get things done anymore unlike in the old days. Gan admitted his meeting with the chief minister was fruitless, but would keep trying. Keep trying for what? He should stop embarrassing the MCA and reducing its credibility further by continuing to beg despite being rebuffed earlier. Again, this proved that the Malaysian Chinese Association has really completely lost its usefulness. If a small matter like Jonker Walk closure was beyond its power then, that 's it.

Jun 22, 2013

Anwar: 505 rally will go on - Nation | The Star Online

Anwar: 505 rally will go on - Nation | The Star Online

Black 505: Live updates - Nation | The Star Online

Black 505: Live updates - Nation | The Star Online

Feb 15, 2013

How To Repair Your Own Refrigerator And Save A Bundle





when I received a call the other day (night) from a Miss Lee complaining about her fridge not working (she noticed the temperature inside the fridge was warm comparable to room temperature), I asked her to check if the fridge's power switch was at on or off?

Dec 3, 2016

The Government Knee-jerk Reaction







The Drl Blog





























To Be Fair This Umno-led BN Government Is Not Against Chinese Per se - They Are Against The DAP!

A person with a little bit of thinking capacity will be able to see through the minister's action. The New Village movie was put on back burner for having scenes that teach people to be communists, according to him. There's no indication if Astro will be allowed to air the movie, its own production, but judging by the harsh and uncompromising tone of the minister, probably not. So indignantly the people behind the project advised Malaysians - their target audience - to either go for DVD or YouTube to solve the problem. Checked.

But these people are more intelligent than me (they, for instance, could produce a good movie), but I must say they were not smart for titling their production as "New Village." They should have learned from experience (where were they when Chin Peng died and had wished to be buried in his home town Setiawan, and the government represented by the same minister went to all lengths to prevent that?)...Checked.

Okay judging from other people's experience, that any movies produced by Chinese or have anything to do with Chinese history will not be allowed in this country as long as this government is in power. Checked.

When Astro advised the possible audience to go for DVD and or YouTube to circumvent their power, the minister got even more determined to stop Malaysians from viewing the unapproved content he said. Hence the threat to even go to the unprecedented length of censoring YouTube. This was a knee-jerk reaction to Astro Shaw's smart move. Checked.

The question is: will the Malays accept this unprecedented move (which they can see was just a ploy to hem in the Chinese Malaysians)? But the person as intelligent as the minister would never embark on something if it entails his shooting himself in the foot. He must believe that the Malays are not that internet savvy (although granted Malays do tune on to YouTube) to miss anything so probably they don't mind their government shutting down YouTube? It's safe to shut down YouTube, he reckons, if the Malays won't miss it. Won't they? Checked.

But will the same minister be so anti-communism now that the Umno-led BN so whole-heartedly applauded the prime minister's well-heralded trade delegation to China where he asked the Chinese government to invest in almost everything except building of mosques, perhaps? As it turned out the Chinese communists are people with credibility and integrity and easy to do business with - hence, Najib even deserted his long time golf partner, President Obama's America and went over to the country (the race) that the minister and other Umno leaders liked to demonize and despise so much. Checked.

That's why, the Chinese say they are the only real people in this world! The rest are just ghosts. Red-haired ghosts (Hoong-moh kwai), Malai Kwai (Malay ghosts), or Kaling-kwai (Indian ghosts), etc. Checked.

The world over everyone knows the Middle Kingdom people are honest and reliable. And the prime minister was wise in inching closer to China. From now onward, Malaysia doesn't have to worry about where to get investment or funds to develop the country; China has the world's largest money reserve. Check.

One thing to remember, though, China is all for making friends and money doing business with people wherever they may be - they don't tolerate double-crossing. Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content







Dec 2, 2016

Why A Muslim Parades Himself As A Christian?








The Drl Blog





























Keith Maurice Ellison Congressman-elect (D-MN) Would Have A Hard Time Convincing voters of The Fifth District of Minnesota To Elect Him Had He Not Paraded Himself As A Christian Checked.

By David Lang

Have Americans come to term with Rep. Ellison being a Muslim but not quite? Have you ever asked him point-blank, who is he? Of course, you won't ask him if he's a Muslim as his name suggests he's a Christian? It would be interesting to hear from him personally (from the horse's mouth, if you will), what is religion, that's, if you finally decide to give way to your curiosity. Checked.

Do you believe he will answer the question, or back away as usual? Checked.

According to Fox News report today, Rep. Ellison - who is fighting to be DNC chairman - strictly avoided to talk about his past. At first he agreed to be interviewed by phone but later when the time came, reneged on his promise. He gave no reason for not talking about his past or who he is. Checked.

Nothing unusual, or surprising there. Rep. Ellison, I believe, would never reveal who he really is if he could help it. For his success so far from being an unknown Muslim Congressman to now challenging the DNC chair - was largely due to the opaqueness of his behavior. I believe he believed if he presents himself as a Muslim when he's campaigning for office as people's representative he's afraid he would be rejected (especially now that the majority of Muslims have been identified as likely terrorists whose sole aim as Muslims was to convert or kill infidels). Checked.

I hate to call Rep. Ellison - whose full name once was Keith Maurice Ellison when he was an African-American Christian - a deceiver but..sorry for saying this, that's what he seems to be. A deceiver. Yes, you heard me, a deceiver! Checked.

I came to know about this Muslim convert for a long time. I knew about his passion about promoting the greatness of Islam - like what President Obama had been vowing - with the aim to gradually take over America and turn it into a Muslims country with sharia law; about his opaque way to achieve that agenda by not using Muslim name such as Mohammad or Mohamed which is most popular among Muslims; about his crying like a baby at Republican Rep. Steve King's public hearing on Muslim CAIR's role in working with the Muslim Brotherhood to undermine America from within; about his being a very conservative Muslim who seemed to be prepared to even die for his religion but at the same time he chose to parade himself as a Christian - meaning he's ashamed to be a Muslim, or known as a Muslim. Is he? Was he, past tense? Checked.

I shudder to think what was his intention in wanting to be the DNC chairman? Checked.

I read in Fox News report today referring to him as Rep. Ellison; without the his first name Keith (Maurice) which was the usual case back in those years. What did it mean the removal of his first name? Was it a typo? I hope so. I am quite happy that he had removed the name Keith from his full name; if, say, that was his intention, not a typo. Checked.

But then again, I heard people say MSM are siding with the Democrats; Rep. Keith Maurice Ellison is a Democrat. If he asked them to omit Keith Maurice from his full name, they will. There's no doubt about that. Let's wait and see. Checked.

I hope Congress will introduce a law to ban Muslim politicians from parading themselves as Christians to deceive American voters. Checked.

Still, I am still not hundred percent satisfied that he continued to mislead the American voters that he and another of his kind, Andre Carson, were not Muslims! They are. And in cahoots with the Muslim Brotherhood or Sisterhood to silently work to transform America - like what President Obama had been doing for years.Checked.

Years ago I became aware of this Congressman's design to cheat the American voters into voting for him by not using Muslim names. And I had been turning out articles after articles, mostly on MSNBC Newsvine.com to expose him. Checked.

Lest I am misunderstood, I have no problem with Keith Maurice Ellison or any Muslims in America, for that matter, becoming a Congressmen or senators. My beef was with his parading himself as a Christian when he is not! Checked.

With his passion for his Islamic religion to the extent of emotional break down at a public hearing by Rep. Peter King, and was widely known (and derided) on social media as a man shedding crocodile tears - expect him to protest as emotionally against being not allowed to use Muslim names - if there's such a ban! Checked.

If he's so passionate about being a Muslim, he should not hide the fact that he's a Muslim like a plaque; be a man and face the voters as who he really is: a Muslim man, and see if he could win. As it's, he should not be proud of his achievement as it came through fraud called deception. Checked.

He of course, could argue that he was well-known as a Muslim Congressman. That maybe so, but when facing his voters they could think that Keith name is a Christian name. In Muslim majority countries like Indonesia or Malaysia, he won't last a month! They (religious authorities and Muslims in the streets) will hound him and accuse him of trying to convert other Muslims and will be punished severely. Checked.

He could count himself lucky that he's (parading as Christian) in America, and get away with it. President-elect Trump should work to have a legislation passed in Congress and the Senate houses to ban Muslims parading as phony Christians to deceive voters. If they think they are good enough to be a Congressman or Senator, why hide their Muslim names behind Christianity? Checked.

Even if in the US there is no law outlawing using one's original name after embracing Islam, only surname should continue to be used, not first name which is a Christian name such as John or Keith. When John embraces Islam he will be given a Mohamed or Faisal or Abdul name. Checked.

We don't know, Keith Maurice Ellison never reveals, what his Muslim name is. Whatever name he's given, or he himself chose, when he became a Muslim - please use it! Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content



Hillary Clinton Chucked Ethics Out The Window







The Drl Blog





























Hillary Clinton Chucked Ethics Out The Window. Checked.

By David Lang

The reason the Democrats or any public officials allied to them put forward for asking for recounts was that the law allows. That's true; but what about the wisdom of doing it? Hadn't Hillary Clinton conceded and proclaimed "Trump is our president and we should give him a chance to govern?" Had the Democrat lawyers including the Democrats themselves as a whole said no evidence of fraud or hacking was found? Moreover, machines were not connected to the internet, for crying out loud. Checked.

Otherwise - the Democrats or the Green would not be so restrained, would they? They simply excused that what's wrong with doing a recount. That their reason for joining the recount scam was it's permitted by law. It's not illegal. Is that all? What about decency; fair play, and American values that Hillary said we had been abiding by 200 years, without problem? Checked.

Therefore it's not fair for Trump to say he would wait until the election is over before accepting, the result, they said. Now after Trump won she did keep her word to accept Trump "as our president" but only for a few days! Checked.

So what happens now? Why she changed her mind? Was she roped in by George Soros, again? It can't be other reason; only a few days ago there were reports of the top liberal left leaders allegedly held a brainstorming session in a hotel with the said agenda of stealing the election from Donald Trump. Checked.

What excuse she gave after agreeing to support or joining with the Green candidate Jill Steins to request for recounts in three states where Trump won but with less decisive vote was nothing but a scam, the president-elect said. So, the intention was clear - to overturn Trump's win, and allow Hillary Clinton to become president. Checked.

The American voters should not forget these misdeeds of Jill Steins and Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party to not vote for them again in future. And end their political careers for good! Checked.

For your information, we cannot blame Hillary Clinton alone. The main culprits are George Soros and his son and President Obama which included Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany who lead the new world order! Checked.

Here are some of related headlines on Fox News: Hurt:Clinton should not support Steins recount effort Checked.

Hannity: Recount effort undermines a democratic election Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content






Nov 25, 2016

Jill Stein And Green Party Are Pawns To Sabotage Trump's Win







The Drl Blog





























If Hillary Won Would She Ask For Recount In Key States? Checked.

By David Lang

What Jill Stein has done defies all reasons and ethics. Checked.

In asking for a recount in three key states where Donald Trump won with razor-thin majorities, she or the Green Party toyed with the US constitution. Just because there is a provision all candidates have the right to file for recount in an election where no suspicious of vote fraud is detected., it doesn't mean they should. Checked.

They have to understand the main contender against Trump had already conceded defeat, which means they were satisfied with the way the election was conducted or won. Checked.

So, why are they perusing the matter when it's unnecessary and akin to intending to sabotaging the rights of the winner by creating gridlocks and bad narratives against Trump.Checked.

When pointed to him there was no evidence of fraud whatsoever, Green Party Martin insisted to go ahead with the recount "because we want to make sure all our votes count." Checked.

So when told the request for recount was an exercise in futility, he was defiant.Checked.

This action did not stem from desire to correct what was wrong, rather it was done to frustrate the president-elect or worse, if possible, deny Trump the presidency he won fair and square.Checked.

In that case, it's unlikely the Green Party was compelled by desire to correct what's wrong - but to make it wrong what was right.Checked.

This could ignite debate on what or who caused the recount to be mooted. It was reported initially one computer expert and an election activist (two persons that's all it took) had alleged that the vote counting machines could have been hacked (Haven't they always?) Checked.

So, the Green Party or Jill Stein hadn't themselves come across any evidence of fraud but just seized on what the computer expert and his activist friend had alleged. It couldn't be the Green Party or Jill Stein as both didn't complain about the the general election being rigged from beginning. People couldn't be blamed if they thought the Green Party was just a tool in this controversy. Checked.

The two who made the allegation could be working for George Soros or his son who are going all out to protect their new world order in collaboration with perhaps interested parties such as Harry Reid who seemed to hate Trump so much; the Democratic party or The Clinton foundation and last but not least, President Obama - all of who stand to lose heavily if Trump becomes president. Checked.

But then again, what's to stop the Republicans from asking for recounts when the Democrats candidates win in the future. Yes, when George W. Bush was leaving the White House after eight years, he left gentlemanly, and the Republican Party allowed Barack Hussein Obama to be inaugurated as the 44th president without asking third party to create trouble for then president -elect to frustrate him. But since the Democrats led by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi tried to play dirty, the American voters should punish them even more than their losing control of both Houses of congress and senate - these Democrats should not be allowed to win future elections as they are clearly working to aid the Muslim Brotherhood to take over America in cahoots with President Barack Hussein Obama! Checked.

Just imagine a candidate in a national election which he or she had never alleged was rigged or biased, filed for recount in the three states that was because the winner won with a razor-thin majorities. Hoping that the recounts would result in the winner losing the three states? Why they wanted to do that for? Or the good question is: why allow these sour grapes to abuse the system? Maybe they are not sour grapes, maybe they are pawns. Pawns are people or persons who allow themselves to be used as pawns. They do it for money, other quid pro quo, or are blackmailed due to their previous indebtedness to the puppet master, or threatened with bodily harm by the pawn master unless they comply; or, who knows, maybe Jill Stein thought if she could create a national controversy which depict her as the hero to uphold, sic, American values like what Obama has been singing praise for the last eight years, and propel her name to prominence to prepare herself to be lifted away from the stigma of being "not good enough" to "good enough," she could do better next time.And then again, who knows, she maybe good enough to be bank-rolled by George Soros in his next project in four years' time! Checked.

That shows what a corrupt and ambitious woman would do. As they say, hell has no fiery compared to a woman spurned - or shall we say, a woman unceremoniously rejected. Checked.

Doesn't it ever occurs to her that by trying to throw a spanner in people's works - that's how how it looks like - the voters or her supporters in these three states or other states will not have second thoughts about her wholesome characters she had been spewing out to them all these years that she's a fair and just person? Checked.

I am not Trump's relative or brother and had nothing to do with his campaign, but I want the voters or supporters everywhere in the US to not vote for this sore loser Jill Stein and her Green Party to spite them. Checked.

What they have done was uncalled-for, unethical, vicious, unfair, immoral and unforgivable! Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content



Jill Stein Of Green Party Stirs Hornets' Nest







The Drl Blog





























If Hillary Won Would She Ask For Recount In Key States? Checked.

By David Lang

The Green Party candidate Jill Stein was more than enthusiastic about having vote recount in key states - no! even worse than that; in fact, she's appearing as frantic as her house is going to be swept away by storm! Checked.

Jill Stein just had her chance to make a difference in the just concluded general election, and she blew it - or shall we say, the voters rejected her as she was found to be not good enough compared with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.Checked.

The question people want to ask her is why? Why she stirred up the hornets' nest when she's not going to benefit from any reduction in vote count for Donald Trump when the party that's clearly, automatically will be a beneficiary of any change in vote tally which may in an unlikely event Donald J. Trump is disqualified to become the 45th of the US, is Hillary Clinton of the Democratic Party! Checked.

What is she trying to prove - to get at Donald Trump for his win which everyone from Democrats to biased media establishment - and even world leaders - called it unexpected, unprecedented, unbelievable? Checked.

Or is she trying to prove even though she could not or could ever be president of the US because she's not good enough, she could and wanted to hurt hurt innocent people? What has Trump done to her to deserve her hatred and vengeance so destructive? She's not even directly Trump's rival. A distant rival maybe but not a rival in term of destroying his presidential dream. And Trump was not the cause of her failure at the election. Third party candidates as everyone knows never make it anywhere in the world. Checked.

So what exactly made her do it then? Power is not on list, as she she is unlikely to end up winning the general election (she only managed to win only one percent of the votes cast). Next on the list is she had gone over to the Democrat side, after being approached by the Hillary camp. You know what that will mean when the Clinton rope you in (like those 11 women who were led out like sheep to the slaughter house, to denounce Trump for grabbing their private parts and also kissing them on the mouths without their prior permission) to do something for them? Checked.

Even former Miss Universe Alicia Mashado who once was about to be axed by the pageant's executives because she was too fat and Trump intervened to save her participation in the Miss Universe contest on condition she exercised to reduce weight, saw more benefit in allying herself to Hillary Clinton who had done nothing for her whatsoever. Checked.

Another reason which seems likely was, George Sorros told her he bankrolled Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election' and probably gave her a hint he might be looking for another candidate to challenge President Donald J. Trump in four years' time. What can I do, sir, to deserve your support like Hillary did, she might have asked George Sorros? And the philanthropist answered: "Join my team to strengthened the new world order, stupid?" Checked.

The last reason that she might want the American people to think she's doing for is she's concerned about American values (like President Obama claimed to have abided by and have been promoting all these years)? That's not what she aimed to do, believe me. But if any of you opined that she's a sour grape, I may agree with you little bit.Checked.

And we should ask her what is her aim to achieve by refusing to accept the result even Hillary camp had no problem with? The Democratic Party nominee had even publicly accepted she lost to Donald and proclaimed "Donald j. Trump is our new president!" Checked.

By her action she had lent credence to those sore losers who kept trumpeting Hillary's excess popular votes which they claimed now surpassed 2,000,000 votes! Didn't she know that by keeping shouting Hillary chalked up more votes than Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton stalked up more votes than Donald Trump! they hoped to keep the matter alive, hoping some authorities of the election fraternity to step forward to agree to allow a recount in states that propelled Trump to the White House with a view to deploying gangsters to threaten electoral voters to vote against Trump and allow the Obama and George Sorros' New World Order camp to snatch the White House from Trump. Checked.

And Jill Stein was apparently "roped" in by the Democrat-Obama-George-Sorros team to play a central role; thus not giving themselves away as there's conflict of interest if they the Democrats themselves are demanding a recount. Checked.

By doing this (allowed herself to be used), Jill Stein forfeits her rights to run for president in future general election as a person who toys with the electoral college votes. I ask all American voters - just like I had asked American voters to reject Hillary Clinton for her being a stooge of President Obama even after he left office - to reject the traitor to our American values by her toying with electoral votes system which our forefather wisely put in place! Checked.

Do you wish to know more?

Skip to Content